Scattergood Friends School Committee

 

Minutes  3/31/2001

 

The School Committee met on Saturday, March 31st at 9:00 am at Scattergood Friends School.  The

Meeting began with an Executive Session.

 

Present: Ron Knight, Bruce Rohwer, Barb Garlinghouse, Bob Rye, Jim Kenney, Burt Kisling, Bob Winchell, Dan Treadway, Joe Davison, Perry-O Sliwa, George Welch, Richard Johnson, Lucy Hansen.

 

Absent: Anita Richards, Jeff Kisling, Lowell Wilson

 

Staff members present for the General Session included Nan Fawcett, Margie Figgins, Ken Hinshaw, Sarah French, Erin Lane.

 

 

Executive Session

 

After opening with a moment of silence Lucy reported that Anita had felt a need to resign from the School Committee.

 

She also reminded committee members to send in their evaluations of the Director if they have not already done so.

 

Lucy reminded subcommittee clerks to email their reports to Jeff so that they can be posted online.

 

She reported that she and Ken had met to sign his contract for the upcoming year.

 

Richard showed a newly-revised form for the staff to use in evaluating the Director. The School Committee approved the use of this form, and it will be sent out to staff shortly.

 

George reported on his first meeting as a trustee of the Scattergood Foundation. He encouraged us to build stronger bridges between the School Committee and the Foundation.

 

A concern was brought about the commingling of restricted gift funds with general operating funds. After a good deal of discussion, the School Committee reaffirmed its minute from September 2000 that such restricted gift funds should be pooled in an entirely separate interest-bearing account, and not simply given their own account line within the general operating budget. For the sake of reassuring donors that the funds will only be used as directed, the funds will not be commingled even though it may cost the school a few percentage points of interest to do it this way, and even though from an accounting standpoint it is unnecessary. Funds for various restricted gifts may be pooled with each other, but none may be pooled with general operating funds. The School Committee instructs the Director to set up and fund a separate interest-bearing account for restricted gift funds (e.g., sound wall gifts) before June 30, 2001, so that it shows up in the fiscal year-end audit.

 

Burt reminded us that as a group we need to be aware of the financial situation of the school, keep the budget in mind when approving future expenditures, and be aware of the capital expenditure policy.

 

General Session

 

Minutes from the February 3 meeting were reviewed and approved with one change. The urinalysis policy will only apply to students for whom it is a condition of attendance at the school, and will not be applied to students whose attendance is not under such restrictions. Accordingly, the minutes should be changed to read:

 

The first is a new protocol for dealing with substance abuse. The main discussion revolved around the difficulty in detecting the use of certain substances and the need to have objective means, such as urinalysis and breathalyzer tests,  to determine that. The staff's primary aim is to have such tools to serve as a deterrent, to help students resist the temptations, AS OUTLINED IN THE SPIRITUAL AND COMMUNITY LIFE SUBCOMMITTEE’S WRITTEN PROPOSALS. The Committee asked that the school's lawyers evaluate the legal aspects of drug testing at the school.

 

Ken read the Director’s Report, and other subcommittee clerks and staff offered additional comments along the way.

 

The Spiritual and Community Life subcommittee brought a proposal for a Student Weekend Employment Program. The School Committee approves the proposal as a pilot program for this spring. We will hear a report later on how the project went and decide then whether to continue to allow student employment.

 

The School Committee accepts the annual financial review report (Draft A) for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2000.

 

Ken reported on his meeting with the school’s attorney regarding a variety of issues and proposals in progress.

 

The Consultation committee will make a report on the issue of loans and paybacks after further review.

 

Burt called our attention to a letter to the editor by Jeff Kisling in the current Friends Journal and told us of the possible publication of Reck’s manifesto in an upcoming issue.

 

Sarah French reported on the admissions projections for next year.

 

Ken and Belle have accepted the School Committee’s offer to take a two month leave this summer. There was discussion of how to proceed with appointing an acting director to cover the day-to-day operations of the school during Ken’s time off. The attorney has given the o.k. to hire a School Committee member to cover the position so long as there is a specific minute from the Committee. Ken will work with Lucy to report next time with a proposal for a candidate for Acting Director.

 

Jeff reported via email on the Technology Committee’s actions.

 

There was a discussion about asking Iowa Yearly Meeting to set aside a time for a Scattergood interest group meeting. The school would need to plan carefully for such a meeting. Burt will contact the IYM Planning Committee to ask them to schedule a time that does not conflict with other meetings. Scattergood would also like to schedule a tour of the campus.

 

The retreat planning group will report at the next meeting with some recommendations for our November retreat.

 

School Committee discussed the afternoon workshops held on Friday, March 30th with students and staff, and generally had upbeat things to say. We were reminded of the importance of spending time on campus and getting to know the staff and students.

 

Consultation Committee asked members to give recommendations for new nominations to the School Committee. Also, School Committee members should let Consultation Committee know if they need to be relieved from their duties or if they would like a change in subcommittee assignment.

 

 

Reflections on the Meeting

 

Barb and Bob W. offered their comments on how the meeting went. Barb gave her support for the recent custom of having the Director’s report interspersed with subcommittee reports.

 

Some concerns were expressed about the difficulty of meeting in subcommittees, especially since so many people serve on several subcommittees.

 

Committee members expressed appreciation for receiving the proposed minutes, agenda, and Director’s report online in advance of the meeting. This has been helpful and is working well.

 

 

 

Richard Johnson

Temporary Recording Clerk